Tag: 2018 midterms

I wanted to mention a few polls and discuss the recent immigration controversy over child separations, and the race in Pennsylvania.

I use http://fivethirtyeight.com and http://realclearpolitics.com to get my polling information.

Two Ohio polls got released on 6/13 that show the Brown ( the Democratic incumbent) is ahead outside of the margin of error with a 16 and 17 point lead.  This means that the races are currently very safe for Brown.  This race is unlikely to flip but I’ll keep my eye out for new polls.

A new poll in West Virginia  shows that Manchin (the Democratic incumbent) with a 6 point lead which is outside of the margin of error.  This combined with other two polls  out right now suggests Manchin is probably leading.

Florida hasn’t had a primary yet,  but two polls in May showed the presumed Republican nominee, Governor Rick Scott, with a slight lead.  In one case the poll was outside the margin of error,  but given the historical errors of early Senate polls,  this is far from definitive.  This is interesting,  but it is to early to tell what this will mean in November.  Incumbents have an advantage,  and Trump is unpopular and that might affect turnout.

The controversy over the child separations of immigrants caught entering illegally might have an effect on the some of the Senate races.  Trump is not on the ballot,  but his (un)popularity might affect turnout which I think is going be very important in this election.    Trump did end the policy,  but it could still affect the election.

In particular, Beto O’Rouke,  the Democratic candidate for Senate in Texas,  may have benefited from controversy.  O’Rouke was on a few news shows and called for the policy to end.  O’Rouke also used social media to discuss his views, which also get him more attention.  As a Texas native,  I did see a lot more activity than usual supporting O’Rouke among my friends on my social media feed.   This is a very biased sample that doesn’t reflect the entire Texas voting population,  but it does signal to me that something may be changing.  Hopefully, another poll will come out in Texas soon.

This post was written on June 10th and may not reflect last minute changes.

2016 Presidential Election result:  Trump: 51.69%,  Clinton 43.56%, Margin: Trump +8.13%

2012 Senate Election result: Brown (D) 50.7%,  Mandel (R) 44.7%

Democratic Candidate: Sherrod Brown

Brown is the incumbent.  He was first elected to the Senate in 2006, and before that he was a U.S. representative and had various state level positions.  He has been highly productive in producing new bills, including bipartisan ones.  My impression of Brown is that he is a moderate Democrat.  His opinion on social issues like abortion and LGBT+ rights may be too liberal for some voters in Ohio.

Republican Candidate: Jim Renacci

Renacci is currently a member of the US House of Representatives, but it wasn’t in his biography which I thought was odd.  Before he was a politician he was a businessman, which seems to be a pattern among Republican candidates in the Trump era.  His views appear to be reminiscent of the 2016 Republican platform.

My Thoughts on the Race:

Brown is the incumbent and the one poll we have had Brown winning by 14 points.   This is one of the races I am watching,  but I don’t think it will flip.  Trump didn’t win by that much in Ohio.  I would consider Ohio a purple state.  Brown has done well in his past elections.  I don’t think a candidate that is similar to Trump is enough to beat an incumbent when Trump isn’t that popular.

I think it is important to watch all the states where there is a mismatch in the Senator’s party and the 2016 Presidential Election result.   I don’t know how much movement there will be.  This new project has been a big learning experience for me.  Control of the Senate is decided by so many unique races.  It’s interesting to learn about the current and future Senators and get a look at a different side of voting behavior.  I have enjoyed watching primary night coverage and learning more about American political geography.

Over the past few days,  a controversy has erupted over West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin’s supposed opinion on the border wall.  In January, Manchin  (a Democrat) said he supports a border wall in an interview on Fox and Friends.   But a recent super PAC ad that says he doesn’t support the border wall which is important in a state where Trump won by a large margin and where (the reduction of illegal) immigration is viewed as an important issue.  Manchin is trying to remove the ad from TV and has a press release here.

Manchin definitely voted yes for cloture on an amendment to the Broader Options for Americans Act that supported increased border security (including physical structures like walls).  The amendment didn’t move any further in the bill making process.  But to make things complicated Manchin was quoted in a Politico article from last July as saying:  (he’s) “not been supportive of funding for a wall.” and “It’s something I have no interest in. I just think we have so many other pressing problems and I think there are other ways immigration needs to be treated.”.  I am curious why there was a change in Manchin’s position  It’s fine that he changed his mind,  but I think he will need to explain the older comments against the wall and increased border security so that he doesn’t look like he changed his mind to attract voters.

I had some trouble sorting out both sides of the story because there was some spin on both sides.  The Republican PAC was trying to sway Trump voters to not vote for Manchin,  but they didn’t mention the GOP candidate.   And Manchin was trying to point out his support for Trump’s immigration agenda,  but I personally feel like he didn’t explain his previous comments in the Politico article,  and I generally trust Politico as a news source.  Hopefully, some new polls will come out so we can see what the voters think about this.  I can see some more attack ads coming out about this topic,  but it always difficult to guess how voters will react.

Political Bias Disclosure: Since I am a strong believer in transparency in the discussion of politics,  I would like to disclose that I am a moderate Republican.   I try to remain unbiased and look at the issues like a voter in that election.

In today’s blog post I will discuss two of the competitive races.  In West Virginia and Indiana, we have two incumbent Democrats from red states.   In these profiles, I want to examine the candidates and the race,  much like a voter would.    I want to look at past elections, the experience of the candidates,  and the stance of the candidates on the issues (as judged by their campaign websites).

Disclaimer:  I am a moderate Republican,  and while I try to remain as objective as possible I acknowledge that my unintentional bias might affect my view of the races.

West Virginia:

2016 Presidential Election result:  Trump: 68.6%,  Clinton 26.5%, Margin: Trump +42.1%

2012 Senate Election result: Manchin (D) 60.6%,  Raese (R) 36.5%

Democratic Candidate:  Joe Manchin

Manchin was governor of West Virginia before he was elected in 2010 during a special election.  He seems to be a more moderate Democrat than most.  What I think makes him appealing is his focus on improving the quality of life of West Virginias through tax, education, and healthcare reform.

Republican Candidate:  Patrick Morrisey

Morrisey has served as the Attorney General of West Virginia since 2012.  He seems to be pretty conservative and has is presenting himself with views that appear similar to Trump (without invoking his name) which is his main advantage.

My Thoughts on the Race:  The polling is limited right now.  I am inclined to believe the Gravis poll which shows Manchin with a 13 point lead, over the WPAi poll which shows Morrisey with a 2 point lead (inside the margin of error).  I know that the incumbency advantage is strong and that Manchin has done well in his past two elections.  But given the polarized environment,  I think Morrisey has a chance.  Hopefully, more polls will tell a better picture.

Indiana:

2016 Presidential Election result:  Trump: 56.9%,  Clinton 37.8%, Margin: Trump +19.1

2012 Senate Election result: Donnelly (D) 50%,  Mourdock (R) 44.3%

Democratic Candidate:  Joe Donnelly

Donnelly has a US representative before he was elected to the senate in 2012.  Donnelly seems moderate.  His website focuses multiple times on the importance of looking at the best policy and not the one associated with a party.

Republican Candidate: Mike Braun

His website  is reminscent of the Trump campaign with “Drain the Swamp” on the front page at the time of this posting.  He is very conservative and similar to Trump (in my opinion).   He could turn off centrists,  (I am a moderate republican and I don’t know if I would vote for him).

My Thoughts on the Race:  If I had to pick which race between Indiana and West Virginia was more likely to flip I would choose Indiana.  There is only one poll  right now. I don’t consider Braun’s  1 point lead to be that meaningful but it shows that the race is very close.  It’s an early poll of 400 voters with 7% undecided, which limits its predictability of the election result.  Indiana is definitely worth watching.

I wanted my one of my first posts about the election to be about the Texas Senate Race.

A few weeks ago,  I listened to the FiveThirtyEight podcast on the Texas Senate Race which discussed the Quinnipiac poll (from April 18th) that showed a statistical tie (Cruz’s lead was less than the margin of error) between Cruz and O’Rouke.  I have thought about the race a lot because it has the potential to be unusually close.

The question of the race is this:  Can a Democratic candidate beat an incumbent Republican in a Red state that Trump won by 9 points?   The poll data is pretty weak right now,  with Real Clear Politics  just showing the Quinnipiac poll and one from JMC Analytics (an agency I have never heard of).  But this is something worth watching, and looks like it will be a close race.

O’Rouke has a chance,  but he will have to work on turnout and flipping Republican and Republican-leaning voters like myself, who are moderate, dislike Cruz and the direction of the GOP.

My planned vote is for Ted Cruz, not because I approve of him nor because I agree with most of his politics,  but because Cruz better represents my politics and I think O’Rouke would vote the party line if elected.  The Republican Senate majority is vulnerable,  which is also influencing my decision.  Only time will tell who the other moderate Republicans will vote for,  but Texas will be a race to watch on election night.